Performance and Satisfaction in Private versus Nonprivate Work Settings
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Behavior
- Vol. 21 (3) , 277-297
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589213003
Abstract
The role of individual differences, task complexity, and privacy in determining performance and environmental satisfaction was explored.Greater arousal levels in a nonprivate office were predicted to decrease satisfaction expressed for nonprivate settings but to increase performance by producing a social facilitation effect. It was proposed that sex and introversion/extroversion would interact with task complexity and privacy. Research participants were 169 introductory psychology students who were randomly placed in either private or nonprivate offices. Results indicated that greater satisfaction was expressed by those working in the private offices. In addition, people working on the complex task were more satisfied in the private setting than the nonprivate one. The social facilitation hypothesis was supported, and male introverts performed best in the nonprivate office on the simple task. Implications for organizations and for future research are discussed. Organizations vary considerably in the layout and design of their offices. However, the effects of spatial characteristics on employees in the office have only recently begun to receive attention (Wineman, 1986). One concern is whether or not the open office is an asset to the organizationKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personality and interior office design: Exploring the accuracy of visitor attributions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- The Open-Plan OfficeEnvironment and Behavior, 1982
- Professor ProxemicsEnvironment and Behavior, 1982
- Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Differential response to anticipated crowding: Psychological effects of social and spatial density.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Effects of Acute Experimental Crowding1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975
- Field study of the proxemic behavior of young school children in three subcultural groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
- Personal Space as Influenced by Sex and Type of MovementThe Journal of Psychology, 1970
- The Effects of Sex and Race Norms On Personal SpaceEnvironment and Behavior, 1970