Position Statement: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology
- Vol. 35 (7) , 721-741
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15563659709162569
Abstract
In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is within 1 hour of ingestion. The administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to 1 hour previously; there are insufficient data to support or exclude its use after 1 hour of ingestion. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accidental administration of activated charcoal into the lung: Aspiration by proxyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Pediatric ingestions: Charcoal alone versus ipecac and charcoalAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Efficacy of charcoal cathartic versus ipecac in reducing serum acetaminophen in a simulated overdoseAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Efficacy of ipecac-induced emesis, orogastric lavage, and activated charcoal for acute drug overdoseAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1987
- Absorption inhibition and enhancement of elimination of sustained-release theophylline tablets by oral activated charcoalAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1986
- Saline cathartics and the adsorptive capacity of activated charcoal for aspirinAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1986
- Concomitant use of activated charcoal and N-acetylcysteineAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Management of acutely poisoned patients without gastric emptyingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Aspiration of activated charcoal and gastric contentsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1981
- Inhibition of theophylline absorption by activated charcoalThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1979