Risk factors for transmission of Ebola or Marburg virus disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 20 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 45 (1) , 102-116
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv307
Abstract
Background: The Ebola virus disease outbreak that started in Western Africa in 2013 was unprecedented because it spread within densely populated urban environments and affected many thousands of people. As a result, previous advice and guidelines need to be critically reviewed, especially with regard to transmission risks in different contexts. Methods: Scientific and grey literature were searched for articles about any African filovirus. Articles were screened for information about transmission (prevalence or odds ratios especially). Data were extracted from eligible articles and summarized narratively with partial meta-analysis. Study quality was also evaluated. Results: A total of 31 reports were selected from 6552 found in the initial search. Eight papers gave numerical odds for contracting filovirus illness; 23 further articles provided supporting anecdotal observations about how transmission probably occurred for individuals. Many forms of contact (conversation, sharing a meal, sharing a bed, direct or indirect touching) were unlikely to result in disease transmission during incubation or early illness. Among household contacts who reported directly touching a case, the attack rate was 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26–38%]. Risk of disease transmission between household members without direct contact was low (1%; 95% CI 0–5%). Caring for a case in the community, especially until death, and participation in traditional funeral rites were strongly associated with acquiring disease, probably due to a high degree of direct physical contact with case or cadaver. Conclusions: Transmission of filovirus is unlikely except through close contact, especially during the most severe stages of acute illness. More data are needed about the context, intimacy and timing of contact required to raise the odds of disease transmission. Risk factors specific to urban settings may need to be determined.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ebola and Marburg Hemorrhagic Fevers: Neglected Tropical Diseases?PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2012
- Ebola haemorrhagic fever outbreak in Masindi District, Uganda: outbreak description and lessons learnedBMC Infectious Diseases, 2011
- A limited outbreak of Ebola haemorrhagic fever in Etoumbi, Republic of Congo, 2005Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2011
- Serologic Cross-Reactivity of Human IgM and IgG Antibodies to Five Species of Ebola VirusPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2011
- Ebola haemorrhagic feverPublished by Elsevier ,2010
- Factors Associated with Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever: Analysis of Patient Data from Uige, AngolaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Newly Discovered Ebola Virus Associated with Hemorrhagic Fever Outbreak in UgandaPLoS Pathogens, 2008
- Understanding the dynamics of Ebola epidemicsEpidemiology and Infection, 2006
- Outbreake of Marburg virus disease in Johannesburg.BMJ, 1975
- Spermatogene Übertragung des „Virus Marburg“Klinische Wochenschrift, 1968