Relative effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction who have survived malignant ventricular arrhythmias
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 34 (4) , 1090-1095
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00327-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure: Will the Solution Be Shocking?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- A Comparison of Antiarrhythmic-Drug Therapy with Implantable Defibrillators in Patients Resuscitated from Near-Fatal Ventricular ArrhythmiasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIATThe Lancet, 1997
- Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIATThe Lancet, 1997
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are preferable to drugs as primary therapy in sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmiasProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1996
- Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID)—Rationale, design, and methodsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Association Between Ease of Suppression of Ventricular Arrhythmia and SurvivalCirculation, 1995
- Relation of acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy to left ventricular function in coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Predictive survival models for resuscitated victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with coronary heart disease.Circulation, 1985
- Predictors of the Success or failure of medical therapy in patients with chronic recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia: A discriminant analysisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983