How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials
Open Access
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 75 (2) , 181-187
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.025833
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and waywardThe Lancet, 2002
- The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against decipheringThe Lancet, 2002
- Statistics Notes: Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trialsBMJ, 2001
- Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the treesBMJ, 2001
- Trends in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials Through the 20th CenturyStroke, 2001
- DICE 2: A FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CHANCE IN LIFE, DEATH AND SUBGROUP ANALYSESInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2001
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2000
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1999