Longer pre-hospital delay in acute myocardial infarction in women because of longer doctor decision time
Open Access
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 53 (8) , 459-464
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.8.459
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the pre-hospital delay times in patients with proven acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify possibilities for reduction of treatment delay. DESIGN: Descriptive three centre study. SETTING: One university teaching hospital and two regional hospitals in Groningen, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 400 consecutive confirmed AMI patients, age below 75 years, admitted to coronary care departments. MAIN RESULTS: Mean age was 59 years and 78% of patients were men. Within two hours after onset of symptoms half of the patients with AMI arrived at the hospital. Patient, doctor, and ambulance delay times (median values) were 30, 38, and 35 minutes respectively. Calling the personal general practitioner (GP) or the locum tenens and whether or not the AMI occurred during a weekend or on a working day had no consequences for pre-hospital delay times. At night patients waited longer before calling a GP than in the daytime. There was a positive correlation between patient and doctor delay. Twenty two per cent of AMI patients waited two hours or more before calling a GP. Total pre-hospital delay times differed between men and women. Longer doctor delay in women (36 minutes for men and 52 minutes for women) was caused by displacement of specific symptoms, in particular in women. AMI patients who were alone during onset of symptoms showed higher patients delay (72 compared with 23 minutes). CONCLUSION: In hospital admitted patients younger than 75 years pre-hospital delay times are within acceptable limits. In some subgroups further reduction is attainable, for example in patient delay outside office hours and when patients are alone during onset of symptoms, in doctor delay in cases where women present with symptoms suggestive for AMI. Improvement of facilities for pre-hospital electrocardiographic diagnosis may facilitate decision making by GPs. Good opportunities for further reduction of treatment delay exist in shortening of hospital delay.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors influencing the time to administration of thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (data from the national registry of myocardial infarction)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Impact of a thrombolysis research trial on time to treatment for acute myocardial infarction in the emergency departmentThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.BMJ, 1992
- Time delays in provision of thrombolytic treatment in six district hospitals. Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and a Cardiology Committee of Royal College of Physicians of London.BMJ, 1992
- Sex Differences in the Management of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1988
- Value of admission electrocardiogram in predicting outcome of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: A 26-year follow-up of the Framingham populationPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- IMPROVED SURVIVAL AFTER EARLY THROMBOLYSIS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1985
- Components of delay in the pre-hospital phase of acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972