What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in State Politics & Policy Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (2) , 107-125
- https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000500500201
Abstract
Among the least-researched American elections are those for seats on the states' supreme courts, arguably some of the most important political positions in the states. We know not only that campaign spending in these races has increased sharply in the past 20 years but also that there is great variation in spending among them. What factors cause campaign spending to vary among races for the states' highest courts? And what can an understanding of campaign spending in these races tell us about campaign spending for other offices? I use data from 281 state supreme court races in 21 states from 1990 to 2000 to answer these questions. I find that state supreme court campaign spending is driven by the characteristics of the race, institutional arrangements, and the electoral and state supreme court context.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional DesignPolitical Research Quarterly, 2003
- State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial ReformAmerican Political Science Review, 2001
- “Haves” Versus “Have Nots” in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric CasesLaw & Society Review, 2001
- Congressional Campaign Spending and the Quality of DemocracyThe Journal of Politics, 2000
- Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American StatesPolitical Research Quarterly, 1995
- Electoral Competition in the American StatesAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Money and Votes in State Legislative ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1991
- Challengers in U. S. Senate ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1989
- Order in the Courts: a Neo-Institutional Approach to Judicial ConsensusThe Western Political Quarterly, 1989
- Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988