Reshaping the regulatory landscape: border skirmishes around the Bahamas and Cayman offshore financial centres

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Processes of globalization involve changes in the spatialities of power and social relations. This article develops a theory of regulatory landscapes, as a conceptual tool to aid our understanding of processes of globalization. Regulatory landscapes vary along two dimensions, both of which relate to scale and boundaries and extend from 'bounded' to 'trans-boundary': first, the degree of boundedness of economic accumulation; and second, the degree of boundedness of political regulation. Processes of geo-regulatory change, then, may be conceived in terms of two analytically separable moments. The first moment of geo-regulatory change is the trans-boundary extension of economic accumulation. The second moment, which is the focus of this article, is the trans-boundary or extra-territorial extension of political regulation. It is hypothesized that the attempted trans-boundary extension of political regulation - to avoid regulatory underprovision - leads to border skirmishes, battles or negotiations about the nature of boundaries. These processes of geo-regulatory change are examined through the lens of offshore financial development in the Bahamas and Cayman. Two geolegal cases or border skirmishes - the Castle Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia cases - are investigated ethnographically to reveal the changing meanings attached to borders during processes of geo-regulatory change. In conclusion a general model of geo-regulatory change is presented in which border skirmishes, negotiations about the allocation of power and authority or the shape of the regulatory landscape, play a central role.

This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit: