Another Look At Evaluating Aptitude-Achievement Discrepancies in the Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Special Education
- Vol. 18 (4) , 477-487
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698401800404
Abstract
Congressional vagueness in the definition of learning disability has resulted in numerous statistical definitions based on achievement-ability test differences. Previous statistical research has helped to clarify the issues and to eliminate some inadequate models. This paper examines three models still considered useful to this point. The models are the prediction model, true score regression model, and prescore partialling model. Results of the analysis conducted here 'provide support for the regression model as the simplest to use and most efficient statistically.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical Measurement Issues in Learning DisabilitiesThe Journal of Special Education, 1984
- The Relative Error Magnitude in Three Measures of ChangePsychometrika, 1982
- The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disordersJournal of School Psychology, 1982
- A Base-Free Measure of ChangePsychometrika, 1966