Taming Systemically Important Financial Institutions
Top Cited Papers
- 9 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking
- Vol. 45 (s1) , 37-58
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12036
Abstract
We model a systemically important financial institution that is too big (or too interconnected) to fail. Without credible regulation and strong supervision, the shareholders of this institution might deliberately let its managers take excessive risk. We propose a solution to this problem, showing how insurance against systemic shocks can be provided without generating moral hazard. The solution involves levying a systemic tax needed to cover the costs of future crises and more importantly establishing a systemic risk authority endowed with special resolution powers, including the control of bankers’ compensation packages during crisis periods.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk-Taking Incentives and Losses in the Financial CrisisSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Taxing Systemic RiskPublished by Wiley ,2010
- Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisisPublished by Elsevier ,2010
- Corporate Governance of Banks after the Financial Crisis - Theory, Evidence, ReformsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Large Risks, Limited Liability, and Dynamic Moral HazardEconometrica, 2010
- Does Banks' Size Distort Market Prices? Evidence for Too-Big-To-Fail in the CDS MarketSSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
- Forbearance and Prompt Corrective ActionJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007
- Optimal Security Design and Dynamic Capital Structure in a Continuous‐Time Agency ModelThe Journal of Finance, 2006
- Agency and Optimal Investment DynamicsThe Review of Financial Studies, 2006
- Dynamic Prudential Regulation: Is Prompt Corrective Action Optimal?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006