Induction agents for day‐case anaesthesia A double‐blind comparison of propofol and midazolam antagonised by flumazenil
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 45 (3) , 198-203
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14684.x
Abstract
Early postoperative recovery was studied using sedation scoring, measurement of flicker fusion frequency and completion of Trieger test figures in 60 male patients who presented for vasectomy under general anaesthesia as day patients. Anaesthesia was induced in groups 1 and 2 (20 patients each) with mean (SD) doses of 0.16 (0.04) mg/kg or 0.16 (0.03) mg/kg midazolam respectively; group 2 received flumazenil 0.55 (0.19) mg after completion of surgery. The remaining 20 patients (group 3) received propofol 1.50 (0.24) mg/kg. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane vaporized in 33% oxygen and nitrous oxide in all patients. Flumazenil tended to improve tests of recovery after midazolam anaesthesia, but early recovery after propofol anaesthesia was associated with better psychomotor test results and less impairment of mental state as judged by sedation and amnesia scoring.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mood evaluation and outpatient anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1988
- Hodgkin's disease in adults: the challengePostgraduate Medical Journal, 1985
- AGE AND PLASMA PROTEINS INFLUENCE THE ACTION OF MIDAZOLAMAnesthesiology, 1984
- The anaesthetist and the day‐surgery unitAnaesthesia, 1982
- Evaluation of midazolam as an intravenous induction agentAnaesthesia, 1981
- The Effective Dose of MidazolamAnesthesiology, 1981
- A Water-soluble Benzodiazepine, RO 21–3981, for Induction of AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1978
- Measuring Recovery From Anesthesia - A Simple TestAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1969
- Measuring Recovery From Anesthesia - A Simple TestAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1969