Nonprogressive evolution in a clade of CretaceousMontastraea-like corals
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 425-446
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300010988
Abstract
A phylogeny of CretaceousMontastraea-like corals was constructed and used to evaluate the importance of differential speciation, selective extinction, and developmental constraints in the evolutionary history of the clade. Colonies assembled from localities across the central and western Tethyan region were subdivided into four stratigraphic levels: (1) Neocomian to lower Albian, (2) upper Albian to Cenomanian, (3) Turonian to Campanian, and (4) Maastrichtian. Ten corallite characters were measured on transverse thin sections of each colony, and analyzed following a three-step procedure: (1) species were recognized using all-inclusive average linkage cluster analyses (UPGMA) and a series of iterative canonical discriminant analyses; (2) species were separated by stratigraphic level and linked between levels by comparative analysis of the resulting discriminant scores; and (3) ancestor-descendant relationships were interpreted within and among adjacent levels using phenetic and cladistic approaches. A composite tree was then examined with respect to biogeography.The results suggest that a total of 16 species existed during the Cretaceous, only 2 of which extended between stratigraphic levels. Speciation events between levels 1 and 2 were associated with the radiation of “small-corallite” forms from a “large-corallite” form, as its distribution expanded southward into the Tethyan realm. Limited speciation and stasis predominated among species within the clade between levels 2 and 3. Speciation events between levels 3 and 4 were associated with the radiation of predominantly “large-corallite” forms from a “small-corallite” form, as the clade became restricted to the Caribbean. Extinction initially focussed on “small-corallite” forms, but later shifted to “large-corallite” forms. Morphologic change was constrained between two extremes, the lower limit of which involved a minimum corallite diameter possibly set by developmental or ecological constraints, and the upper by limitations to increases in number of septa. The overall net result was that of nonprogressive evolution within the clade.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sibling Species in Montastraea annularis , Coral Bleaching, and the Coral Climate RecordScience, 1992
- Longterm Patterns of Morphological Variation within and Among Species of Reef-Corals and their Relationship to Sexual ReproductionSystematic Botany, 1990
- Stickleback fishes: Bridging the gap between population biology and paleobiologyTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1988
- Phylogeny reconstruction in the neogene bryozoan metrarabdotos: A paleontologic evaluation of methodologyHistorical Biology, 1988
- PHENETIC TAXONOMY: Theory and MethodsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1986
- Branching, biomechanics and bryozoan evolutionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1986
- The Continuing Search for OrderThe American Naturalist, 1985
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978
- Autotrophy, Heterotrophy, and Resource Partitioning in Caribbean Reef-Building CoralsThe American Naturalist, 1976
- Diversity and Age Patterns in Hermatypic CoralsSystematic Zoology, 1971