Special Therapeutics: Physiology of Diuretics
- 1 February 1960
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 377-396
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.me.11.020160.002113
Abstract
Chlorothiazide has been by far the most intensely employed of the benzothiadiazines, and its utility and safety are well documented. Hydrochlorothiazide, from a dosage standpoint, is some 10 times as potent as chlorothiazide. However, the 2 compounds are equally effective when employed in equivalent dosages. Both of these compounds cause a profound saluresis of much the same duration when administered orally. Both agents cause a hypokalemia secondary to an increase in excretion of K in some patients, especially when employed at high dosages. The trifluoromethyl analogues of these 2 agents are slightly less active by critical assay than are their chloro analogues. They seem to offer no advantage over chlorothiazide or hypochlorothiazide from the standpoint of utility or safety.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigations Into a New Oral Diuretic, Rontyl ® (6-Trifluoromethyl-7-Sulfamyl-3,4-Dihydro-1,2,4- Benzothiadiazine-1,1-Dioxide). 3Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica, 2009
- URINE VOLUME AND TOTAL RENAL SODIUM EXCRETION DURING WATER DIURESISAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1948
- THE RÔLE OF GONADAL AND ADRENAL CORTICAL HORMONES IN THE PRODUCTION OF EDEMAAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1940