Abstract
The article by Padilla et al. concerning predicting accident frequency in children (Pediatrics 58:223, August 1976) is certainly timely, yet several comments should be made. Padilla et al. are trying to formulate a predictive model for the identification of the "accident-prone" child, presumably for screening purposes. It is clear that the vast majority of accidents do not occur to the "accident repeater," a term which may be defined as a person who has three or more accidents that come to medical attention per year.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: