Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of the Hemodynamic Significance of Epicardial Coronary Artery Stenosis
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 99 (8) , 1090-1095
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.061
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserveEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteriesEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced Myocardial Perfusion MRI Compared with Stress Myocardial Perfusion ScintigraphyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2005
- Noninfarcted Myocardium: Correlation between Dynamic First-Pass Contrast-enhanced Myocardial MR Imaging and Quantitative Coronary AngiographyRadiology, 2003
- Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2003
- Abnormal Subendocardial Perfusion in Cardiac Syndrome X Detected by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ImagingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the HeartCirculation, 2002
- Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease by Magnetic ResonanceCirculation, 2001
- Noninvasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia From Perfusion Reserve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceCirculation, 2000
- Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserveHeart, 1998