Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the GermanHigh-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 14 (6) , 881-893
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg249
Abstract
Background: There is evidence that intensified variants of the classical 3-weekly CHOP-21 chemotherapy [cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (H), vincristine (O), prednisone (P)] may improve treatment outcome in aggressive lymphoma. Three variants using either an addition of etoposide (CHOEP-21: 100 mg/m2 on days 1–3), the shortening to 2-week intervals using recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF; CHOP-14) or both (CHOEP-14) are currently compared with CHOP-21 in the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). To enable more extensive testing of these schemes we here characterise their practicability regarding schedule adherence, acute haematotoxicity and need for supportive treatment. Patients and methods: The trial included patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) aged ≤60 years (NHL-B1) and patients aged 61–75 years (NHL-B2). The data are taken from an interim analysis. Data from 959 patients (CHOP-21: 232; CHOP-14: 238; CHOEP-21: 244; CHOEP-14: 245) from 162 institutions with a total of 5331 therapy cycles were evaluated. Results: The dose adherence in the NHL-B1 trial was excellent. The median relative dose (RD; i.e. actually given compared to planned dose) exceeds 98% for the myelosuppressive drugs in all four regimens. Only ≤5% of patients received a relative dose Conclusions: CHOP-14 with the addition of rhG-CSF is safe and practicable in a large multicentre setting in patients aged 18–75 years. Despite shorter treatment intervals it can be delivered at the same dose as the classical 3-weekly CHOP with a comparable toxicity profile. The addition of etoposide is feasible and safe for patients ≤60 years old in both the CHOEP-21 and CHOEP-14 schemes. For patients >60 years of age the addition of etoposide is associated with marked dose erosion due to increased toxicity. In this age group CHOEP should be used with caution.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Study to Evaluate the Use of High-Dose Therapy as Part of Primary Treatment for “Aggressive” LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- New treatments for Hodgkin’s diseaseCurrent Treatment Options in Oncology, 2002
- CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab Compared with CHOP Alone in Elderly Patients with Diffuse Large-B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Model based development of the BEACOPP regimen for advanced stage Hodgkin’s diseaseAnnals of Oncology, 1998
- Rationale for dose escalation of first line conventional chemotherapy in advanced Hodgkin's diseaseAnnals of Oncology, 1996
- A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group [see comments]Blood, 1994
- Comparison of a Standard Regimen (CHOP) with Three Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma (undifferentiated lymphoma, burkitt's type) in american adults: Results with treatment designed for acute lymphoblastic leukemiaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- CHOP-VP16 chemotherapy and involved field irradiation for high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a phase II multicentre studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1989
- Hydroxyldaunomycin (adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphomaCancer, 1976