Statistical Techniques in Ophthalmic Journals
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 110 (9) , 1225-9
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080210043020
Abstract
• Over the years, the use of statistics to evaluate experimental data in ophthalmology has increased. The present study sought to assess the frequency and types of statistical techniques used in ophthalmic journals. We reviewed 974 original articles from the Archives for 1970,1980, and 1990; the American Journal of Ophthalmologyfor 1990; and Ophthalmology for 1990. Of the 592 articles reviewed for 1990, 391 (66.0%) contained statistics, with measures of central tendency most commonly used (385 articles [65.0%]), followed by dispersion (298 [50.3%]), t test (120 [20.3%]), and contingency tables (98 [16.6%]). A reader familiar with 10 statistical techniques would have "statistical accessibility" to 526 (88.9%) of 1990 articles. A statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of articles containing statistical methods among the journals (P=.0003; Archives, 75.3%; Ophthalmology, 66.8%; and American Journal of Ophthalmology, 55.2%).Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cox Regression Analysis in Clinical ResearchArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1990
- When Does the Failure to Find a Difference Mean That There Is None?Archives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1989
- Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1987
- The Reporting of Statistical Techniques in Otolaryngology JournalsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1987
- Spectrum and frequency of use of statistical techniques in psychiatric journalsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1986
- Refereeing Clinical Research Papers for Statistical ContentAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1985
- Analysis of Follow-up DataArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1985
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Improving Reporting of Follow-Up DataAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- Shall We Count Numbers of Eyes or Numbers of Subjects?Archives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1973