Whose Expectations Matter? The Relative Power of First‐ and Second‐Order Expectations in Determining Social Influence
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by University of Chicago Press in American Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 103 (3) , 692-732
- https://doi.org/10.1086/231253
Abstract
Two types of expectations are proposed to guide social interaction: those one holds for herself (first-order expectations) and these one believes others hold for her (second-order expectations). Also, interaction is assumed to be guided by three motives: contributing to group performance, preserving status, and facilitating interaction. These points are developed by formally incorporating ideas regarding reflected self-appraisals, dramaturgical accounts of the interaction order, and expectancy-value theory into status characteristics theory. When first-and second-order expectations conflict and an actor's motives are equally weighted, it is suggested that second-order expectations guide interaction. An initial experiment provides empirical support and insight for discussion.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluations and the Formation of ExpectationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1995
- Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process TheoryAmerican Sociological Review, 1992
- Parents and the reflected appraisal process: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Toward a Sociological Theory of MotivationAmerican Sociological Review, 1987
- Relative deprivation and procedural justifications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Status Characteristics and Expectation States: Fitting and Testing a Recent ModelSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1979
- Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange NetworksAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- Status Characteristics and Social InteractionAmerican Sociological Review, 1972
- Self-Conceptions and Others: A Further Test of Meadian HypothesesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1966
- A Test of Interactionist Hypotheses of Self-ConceptionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1956