How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 120 (1) , 15-21
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prenatal diagnosis for chromosome abnormalities: past, present and futurePathologie Biologie, 2003
- Development and targeted application of a rapid QF‐PCR test for sex chromosome imbalancePrenatal Diagnosis, 2003
- Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision makingPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosisThe Lancet, 2001
- Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy from uncultured amniotic fluid cells using five-colour fluorescencein situ hybridizationPrenatal Diagnosis, 1994
- Rapid detection of aneuploidy in uncultured chorionic villus cells using fluorescence in situ hybridizationPrenatal Diagnosis, 1993
- Chorionic villi sampling: cytogenetic and clinical findings in 500 pregnancies.BMJ, 1987
- Unexpected structural chromosome rearrangements in prenatal diagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis, 1982
- Risk of amniocentesis and laboratory findings in a series of 1500 prenatal diagnosesPrenatal Diagnosis, 1981
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis in 3000 AmniocentesesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979