Current position of 5HT3 antagonists and the additional value of NK1 antagonists; a new class of antiemetics
Open Access
- 10 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 88 (12) , 1823-1827
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601033
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention of cisplatin‐induced acute and delayed emesis by the selective neurokinin‐1 antagonists, L‐758,298 and MK‐869Cancer, 2002
- Reduction of Cisplatin-Induced Emesis by a Selective Neurokinin-1–Receptor AntagonistNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Consensus proposal for 5HT 3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapySupportive Care in Cancer, 1998
- Optimal Control of Acute Cisplatin-lnduced EmesisOncology, 1996
- The anti‐emetic effects of CP‐99,994 in the ferret and the dog: role of the NK1 receptorBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1995
- Ondansetron Compared with Granisetron in the Prophylaxis of Cyclophosphamide-lnduced Emesis in Out-Patients: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomised, Parallel-Group StudyOncology, 1995
- Characterisation of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the in vitro metabolism of granisetron.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- Ondansetron Compared with Granisetron in the Prophylaxis of Cisplatin-lnduced Acute Emesis: A Multicentre Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group StudyOncology, 1994
- Comparison of dexamethasone and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapyThe Lancet, 1991
- On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983