Why the Traditional Distinction between Public and Private Goods Should be Abandoned
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Theoretical Politics
- Vol. 3 (4) , 355-378
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003004001
Abstract
In this paper we challenge the traditional distinction between public goods and private goods. Economists use a definition of public goods that rests on the inherent properties of the good itself. Referring to criteria such as non-rivalness and non-excludability, they assert that the distinction is fixed in nature and cannot be altered by human observes. We argue that the boundary between public and private goods is socially constructed. That is, what is a public good and what is a private good is not determined by fixed criteria; rather it is decided by society. Thus, what is a public good in one community might be a private good in another. It is this moveable boundary between public and private that makes it essential to analyźe public policy with values up front, not hidden behind the seemingly technical concept of public goods.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Government's Money Monopoly: Externalities or Natural Monopoly?Kyklos, 1984
- Public Decisions as Public GoodsJournal of Political Economy, 1971
- The Income Distribution as a Pure Public GoodThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1971
- The Private Production of Public GoodsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1970
- EFFICIENCY IN THE PROVISION OF CONSUMPTION SUBSIDIESKyklos, 1970
- Public Goods and Subscription TV: Correction of the RecordThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1964
- Television Pricing and the Theory of Public GoodsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1964
- The Economics of NationalismJournal of Political Economy, 1964
- The Federal Communications CommissionThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1959
- Two Propositions Related to Public GoodsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1958