Chlamydia Screening in a Health Plan Before and After a National Performance Measure Introduction
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 106 (2) , 327-334
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000171119.81704.51
Abstract
To evaluate chlamydia-screening policies, testing practices, and the proportion testing positive in response to the new Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) chlamydia-screening performance measure in a large commercial health plan.We interviewed health plan specialty departmental chiefs to describe interventions used to increase chlamydia screening and examined electronic medical records of 15- to 26-year-old female patients--37,438 from 1998 to 1999 and 37,237 from 2000 to 2001--who were classified as sexually active by HEDIS specifications to estimate chlamydia testing and positive tests 2 years before and after the HEDIS measure introduction.In January 2000, the obstetrics and gynecology department instituted a policy to collect chlamydia tests at the time of routine Pap tests on all females 26 years old or younger by placing chlamydia swabs next to Pap test collection materials. Other primary care departments provided screening recommendations and provider training. During 1998-1999, 57% of eligible female patients seen by obstetrics and gynecology exclusively and 63% who were also seen by primary care were tested for chlamydia; in 2000-2001 the proportions tested increased to 81% (P < .001) and 84% (P < .001). Proportions tested by other primary care specialists did not increase substantially: 30% in 1998-1999 to 32% in 2000-2001. The proportion of females testing positive remained high after testing rates increased: 8% during 1998-1999 and 7% during 2000-2001, and the number of newly diagnosed females increased 10%.After the obstetrics and gynecology department introduced a simple systems-level change in response to the HEDIS measure, the proportion of females chlamydia-tested and number of newly diagnosed females increased.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Women 15 to 29 Years of Age: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- American College of Preventive Medicine practice policy statement: Screening for Chlamydia trachomatisAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003
- STD Screening, Testing, Case Reporting, and Clinical and Partner Notification Practices: A National Survey of US PhysiciansAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Improving Preventive Service Delivery Through Office SystemsPediatrics, 2001
- A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery: The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP)American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001
- Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Clinic-Based Support Staff Intervention to Increase the Rate of Fecal Occult Blood Test OrderingPreventive Medicine, 2000
- Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health CarePediatrics, 2000
- Prevention of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease by Screening for Cervical Chlamydial InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1995