Automatically inferred markov network models for classification of chromosomal band pattern structures
- 1 January 1990
- Vol. 11 (1) , 26-39
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990110105
Abstract
A structural pattern recognition approach to the analysis and classification of metaphase chromosome band patterns is presented. An operational method of representing band pattern profiles as sharp edged idealized profiles is outlined. These profiles are nonlinearly scaled to a few, but fixed number of “density” levels. Previous experience has shown that profiles of six levels are appropriate and that the differences between successive bands in these profiles are suitable for classification. String representations, which focuses on the sequences of transitions between local band pattern levels, are derived from such “difference profiles.” A method of syntactic analysis of the band transition sequences by dynamic programming for optimal (maximal probability) string‐to‐network alignments is described. It develops automatic data‐driven inference of band pattern models (Markov networks) per class, and uses these models for classification. The method does not use centromere information, but assumes the p‐q‐orientation of the band pattern profiles to be known a priori. It is experimentally established that the method can build Markov network models, which, when used for classification, show a recognition rate of about 92% on test data. The experiments used 200 samples (chromosome profiles) for each of the 22 autosome chromosome types and are designed to also investigate various classifier design problems. It is found that the use of a priori knowledge of Denver Group assignment only improved classification by 1 or 2%. A scheme for typewise normalization of the class relationship measures prove useful, partly through improvements on average results and partly through a more evenly distributed error pattern. The choice of reference of the p‐q‐orientation of the band patterns is found to be unimportant, and results of timing of the execution time of the analysis show that recent and efficient implementations can process one cell in less than 1 min on current standard hardware. A measure of divergence between data sets and Markov network models is shown to provide usable estimates of experimental classification performance.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computerized chromosome identification by aid of the quinacrine mustard fluorescence techniqueHereditas, 2009
- Experiments in dynamic programming inference of Markov networks with strings representing speech dataPattern Recognition, 1986
- Automatic chromosome analysisClinical Genetics, 1981
- Quantitative analysis of 6985 digitized trypsin G ‐banded human metaphase chromosomesClinical Genetics, 1980
- Description of chromosome banding patterns by band transition sequencesClinical Genetics, 1979
- Visual classification of banded human chromosomesClinical Genetics, 1979
- Visual classification of banded human chromosomes: II. Classification and karyotyping of integrated density profilesAnnals of Human Genetics, 1977
- Iterations of a non-linear transformation for enhancement of digital imagesPattern Recognition, 1975
- The use of distribution functions to describe integrated density profiles of human chromosomesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1973