Dynamics of global histone acetylation and deacetylation in vivo: rapid restoration of normal histone acetylation status upon removal of activators and repressors
Open Access
- 15 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
- Vol. 16 (6) , 743-752
- https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.967302
Abstract
DNA-binding activators and repressors recruit histone acetylases and deacetylases to promoters, thereby generating localized domains of modified histones that influence transcriptional activity. At the end of a transcriptional response, alterations in histone acetylation status are reversed, but the dynamics of this process are poorly understood. Here, we recruit histone deacetylases and acetylases to a well-defined yeast promoter in a regulated manner. Following dissociation of the recruiting protein from the promoter, targeted deacetylation and acetylation are reversed with rapid, yet distinct, kinetics. Reversal of targeted deacetylation occurs within 5–8 min, whereas reversal of targeted acetylation is more rapid, taking 1.5 min. These findings imply that untargeted, globally acting enzymes generate a highly dynamic equilibrium of histone acetylation and deacetylation reactions across chromatin. Targeted acetylases and deacetylases can locally perturb this equilibrium, yet once they are removed, the global activities mediate a rapid return to the steady-state level of histone acetylation. Our results also indicate that TBP occupancy depends on the presence of the activator, not histone acetylation status.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulation of cyclin D2 gene expression by the Myc/Max/Mad network: Myc-dependent TRRAP recruitment and histone acetylation at the cyclin D2 promoterGenes & Development, 2001
- Binding of c-Myc to chromatin mediates mitogen-induced acetylation of histone H4 and gene activationGenes & Development, 2001
- Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and RepressorsMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2001
- Fundamentally Different Logic of Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes and ProkaryotesCell, 1999
- Coactivator and corepressor complexes in nuclear receptor functionCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 1999
- Virus Infection Leads to Localized Hyperacetylation of Histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-β PromoterMolecular Cell, 1999
- What's Up and Down with Histone Deacetylation and Transcription?Cell, 1997
- Factors affecting nucleosome structure in transcriptionally active chromatinEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1990
- GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activatorNature, 1988
- Saturation mutagenesis of the Tn10-encoded tet operator O1Journal of Molecular Biology, 1988