A Comparison of Management Patterns after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Canada and the United States
Open Access
- 18 March 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 328 (11) , 779-784
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199303183281108
Abstract
There are major differences in the organization of the health care systems in Canada and the United States. We hypothesized that these differences may be accompanied by differences in patient care. To test our hypothesis, we compared the treatment patterns for patients with acute myocardial infarction in 19 Canadian and 93 United States hospitals participating in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, which tested the effectiveness of captopril in this population of patients after a myocardial infarction. In Canada, 51 percent of the patients admitted to a participating coronary care unit had acute myocardial infarctions, as compared with only 35 percent in the United States (P<0.001). Despite the similar clinical characteristics of the 1573 U.S. patients and 658 Canadian patients participating in the study, coronary arteriography was more commonly performed in the United States than in Canada (in 68 percent vs. 35 percent, P<0.001), as were revascularization procedures before randomization (31 percent vs. 12 percent, P<0.001). During an average follow-up of 42 months, these procedures were also performed more commonly in the United States than in Canada. These differences were not associated with any apparent difference in mortality (22 percent in Canada and 23 percent in the United States) or rate of reinfarction (14 percent in Canada and 13 percent in the United States), but there was a higher incidence of activity-limiting angina in Canada than in the United States (33 percent vs. 27 percent, P<0.007). The threshold for the admission of patients to a coronary care unit or for the use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the early and late periods after an infarction is higher in Canada than in the United States. This is not associated with any apparent difference in the rate of reinfarction or survival, but is associated with a higher frequency of activity-limiting angina.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Canada's Health Care System Faces Its ProblemsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Hospital Care for Elderly Patients with Diseases of the Circulatory SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Comparison of Invasive and Conservative Strategies after Treatment with Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Effect of Diltiazem on Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The United States and Canada: Different Approaches to Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Canada's Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Rationing Intensive Care — Physician Responses to a Resource ShortageNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Effectiveness of a Regulatory Strategy in Containing Hospital CostsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- A Computer-Derived Protocol to Aid in the Diagnosis of Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982