Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prostatic Surgery. Single‐dose Cephradine Compared with Single‐dose Cefotaxime
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 59 (4) , 314-318
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04639.x
Abstract
Summary— Several previous studies have attested to the value of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostatic surgery. We report a prospective randomised study which compared a single dose of cefotaxime with a single dose of cephradine given with the induction of anaesthesia. There was little difference between these regimens and it was concluded that either may be used, depending on availability and cost of the antibiotic. We have now completed a 5‐year study of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostatic surgery and we also report the results of a long‐term survey of the ward flora. There has been no significant change and there is no evidence for the emergence of resistant strains.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized trial of 48 hours of prophylactic cefotaxime versus single dose in transurethral prostatic surgeryJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1984
- DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY TO COMPARE THE SELECTION OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE BY AMOXYCILLIN OR CEPHRADINE IN THE COMMENSAL FLORAThe Lancet, 1983
- Short-term prophylaxis with cefotaxime for prostatic surgery.BMJ, 1982
- 48-Hour Cephradine and Post-prostatectomy BacteriuriaBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- Bacteriaemia and Bacteriogenic Shock in District Hospital Urological PracticeBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- Systemic Antibiotics for Prophylaxis in Urologic Surgery: A Critical ReviewJournal of Urology, 1979