Implicit versus explicit solvent in free energy calculations of enzyme catalysis: Methyl transfer catalyzed by catechol O-methyltransferase
- 30 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Vol. 124 (17) , 174503
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2186635
Abstract
We compare free energy calculations for the methyl transfer reaction catalyzed by catechol O -methyltransferase using the quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical free energy method with implicit and explicit solvents. An analogous methylation reaction in a solution is also studied. For the explicit solvent model, we use the three-point transferable intermolecular potential model, and for the implicit model, we use the generalized Born molecular volume model as implemented in CHARMM. We find that activation and reactionfree energies calculated with the two models are very similar, despite some structural differences that exist. A significant change in the polarization of the environment occurs as the reaction proceeds. This is more pronounced for the reaction in a solution than for the enzymatic reaction. For the enzymatic reaction, most of the changes take place in the protein rather than in the solvent, and, hence, the benefit of having an instantaneous relaxation of the solvent degrees of freedom is less pronounced for the enzymatic reaction than for the reaction in a solution. This is a likely reason why energies of the enzymereaction are less sensitive to the choice of atomic radii than are energies of the reaction in a solution.This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative study of generalized Born models: Protein dynamicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Comparative Study of Generalized Born Models: Born Radii and Peptide FoldingThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005
- An Assessment of Potential of Mean Force Calculations with Implicit Solvent ModelsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004
- Proton Binding to Proteins: pKa Calculations with Explicit and Implicit Solvent ModelsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2004
- Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structuresJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2003
- Simulation of the folding equilibrium of α-helical peptides: A comparison of the generalized Born approximation with explicit solventProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: Explicit vs. implicit solventProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2003
- Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
- Comparative Study of the Folding Free Energy Landscape of a Three-Stranded β-Sheet Protein with Explicit and Implicit Solvent ModelsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000
- Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamicsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1990