Socio-economic and ethnic group inequities in antenatal care quality in the public and private sector in Brazil
Open Access
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 25 (4) , 253-261
- https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp065
Abstract
Background Socio-economic inequalities in maternal and child health are ubiquitous, but limited information is available on how much the quality of care varies according to wealth or ethnicity in low- and middle-income countries. Also, little information exists on quality differences between public and private providers. Methods Quality of care for women giving birth in 2004 in Pelotas, Brazil, was assessed by measuring how many of 11 procedures recommended by the Ministry of Health were performed. Information on family income, self-assessed skin colour, parity and type of provider were collected. Results Antenatal care was used by 98% of the 4244 women studied (mean number of visits 8.3), but the number of consultations was higher among better-off and white women, who were also more likely to start antenatal care in the first trimester. The quality of antenatal care score ranged from 0 to 11, with an overall mean of 8.3 (SD 1.7). Mean scores were 8.9 (SD 1.5) in the wealthiest and 7.9 (SD 1.8) in the poorest quintiles (P < 0.001), 8.4 (SD 1.6) in white and 8.1 (SD 1.9) in black women (P < 0.001). Adjusted analyses showed that these differences seemed to be due to attendance patterns rather than discrimination. Mean quality scores were higher in the private 9.3 (SD 1.3) than in the public sector 8.1 (SD 1.6) (P < 0.001); these differences were not explained by maternal characteristics or by attendance patterns. Conclusions Special efforts must be made to improve quality of care in the public sector. Poor and black women should be actively encouraged to start antenatal care early in pregnancy so that they can fully benefit from it. There is a need for regular monitoring of antenatal attendances and quality of care with an equity lens, in order to assess how different social groups are benefiting from progress in health care.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethnic Disparities in Access to Care in Post-Apartheid South AfricaAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- O mix público-privado no Sistema de Saúde Brasileiro: financiamento, oferta e utilização de serviços de saúdeCiencia & Saude Coletiva, 2008
- Widening Ethnic Disparities in Infant Mortality in Southern Brazil: Comparison of 3 Birth CohortsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Can mothers rely on the Brazilian health system for their deliveries? An assessment of use of the public system and out-of-pocket expenditure in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study, BrazilBMC Health Services Research, 2008
- The use of maternal and child health services in three population-based cohorts in Southern Brazil, 1982-2004Cadernos de Saude Publica, 2008
- The relative contribution of case management and inadequate care-seeking behaviour to childhood deaths from diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections in Hidalgo, MexicoTropical Medicine & International Health, 2007
- ACOG Committee Opinion #317: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Women's HealthObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Eqüidade e atenção à saúde da gestante em Campinas (SP), BrasilRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 2005
- Fatores associados à inadequação do uso da assistência pré-natalRevista de Saúde Pública, 2003
- How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidencePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2001