Party system change: The catch‐all thesis revisited
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics
- Vol. 14 (1) , 113-128
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389108424835
Abstract
This article re‐examines Kirchheimer's catch‐all thesis in the light of recent discussions by Smith and Mair. Kirchheimer is best understood as presenting an argument about the changing ways in which parties appeal to voters and the effect on links between citizens and government. Although transition to a catch‐all party is often taken as a general phenomenon, Kirchheimer argues that only certain parties will change in this way. How parties adapt depends on perceived needs, internal politics and the political market in which they operate. Parties in multi‐party, issue‐oriented markets will evolve as programmatic parties. Vulnerability of parties reflects not only their organisation but also exposure to the media and a failure to exploit innovative techniques.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuity, change and the vulnerability of partyWest European Politics, 1989
- Core persistence: Change and the ‘people's party’West European Politics, 1989
- Norway: Levels of party competition and system changeWest European Politics, 1989
- Party strategies and system change in the NetherlandsWest European Politics, 1989
- Towards a more open model of competitionWest European Politics, 1989
- Decline of the structured model of electoral competitionWest European Politics, 1989
- Dilemmas of Social Democracy in the 1980sComparative Political Studies, 1988
- The German Volkspartei and the Career of the Catch-All ConceptPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- The transformation of Western European party systems revisitedWest European Politics, 1979
- 6. The Transformation of the Western European Party SystemsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1966