Abstract
The principal aim of this paper is to summarize the best ideas emerging during an informal workshop in which sophisticated scholars and practitioners participated in an effort to identify and appraise possible new approaches to analyzing and resolving international disputes. The results are outlined in terms of the analyses and descriptions of such disputes; the measures that might be taken before, during, and after the disputes have arisen; and some of the methodological problems that arise. These diverse, heterogeneous materials can be tentatively synthesized, it is argued, by postulating the ideal attributes of a Homo Pacificus.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: