A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment
Open Access
- 20 August 2007
- Vol. 110 (5) , 1149-1161
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22892
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Preclinical evidence suggests that anticoagulants, in particular the low‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWH), exert an antitumor effect, whereas clinical trials have reported conflicting results. The authors conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta‐analysis of the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to evaluate the impact of anticoagulants on survival and safety in cancer patients without venous thromboembolism. METHODS. A comprehensive systematic literature review of RCTs was performed without language restrictions through May 2006 with subsequent updates to the end of 2006, including an exhaustive search of electronic databases, major conference proceedings, article references, and content experts. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Primary study outcomes were 1‐year overall mortality and all bleeding complications. Major and fatal bleeding complications were secondary outcomes. RESULTS. Across all 11 studies that were identified, anticoagulation significantly decreased 1‐year overall mortality with a relative risk (RR) of 0.905 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.847–0.967; P = .003). The RR for mortality was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.789–0.975; P = .015) for LMWH, compared with an RR of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.854–1.040; P = .239) for warfarin, resulting in an absolute risk difference (ARD) of 8% for LMWH and an ARD of 3% for warfarin. Improved survival with anticoagulation may be dependent on tumor type. Major bleeding episodes occurred less frequently in patients who received LMWH (ARD, 1%) compared with patients who received warfarin (ARD, 11.5%; P < .0001). Overall, fatal bleeding occurred rarely (ARD, 0.32%; P = .542). CONCLUSIONS. Anticoagulants, particularly LMWH, significantly improved overall survival in cancer patients without venous thrombosis while increasing the risk for bleeding complications. However, given the limitations of available data, the use of anticoagulants as antineoplastic therapy cannot be recommended until additional RCTs confirm these results. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 102 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hypercoagulability preceding cancerJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- A Comparison of Enoxaparin with Placebo for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Acutely Ill Medical PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Final results of a phase III clinical trial on adjuvant intraportal infusion with heparin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in resectable colon cancer (EORTC GITCCG 1983–1987)European Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Tumors: Wounds That Do Not HealNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Effects of EGF and thrombin on inositol‐containing phospholipids of cultured fibroblasts: Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol synthesis by thrombin but not EGFJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1985