Weighing up the evidence: The contribution of critical literature reviews to the development of practice
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in NT Research
- Vol. 4 (4) , 306-313
- https://doi.org/10.1177/136140969900400411
Abstract
Over the past decade there has been increasing awareness of the importance of using sound research evidence to assist clinicians, patients and clients to make informed decisions about aspects of care. The recent drive towards promoting evidence-based healthcare has provided an added impetus, highlighting the important and unique contribution of systematic reviews to this decision-making process. This paper argues that healthcare professionals should also draw on evidence and insights derived from a broader range of research traditions rather than relying on synthesised evidence from randomised controlled trials. The potential of other types of literature is explored.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dovelopment of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique*Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1997
- Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical DecisionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statementBMJ, 1996
- Clinical scholarshipJournal of Professional Nursing, 1995
- Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articlesBMJ, 1994
- Assessing the scientific quality of review articles.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1993
- Qualitative Research: The Evaluation of Its Credibility, Fittingness, and AuditabilityWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1993
- Agreement among reviewers of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- The what and how of teaching researchNurse Education Today, 1991
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985