The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction
Open Access
- 17 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 107 (22) , 10080-10085
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910756107
Abstract
High-affinity, high-selectivity protein-protein interactions that are critical for cell survival present an evolutionary paradox: How does selectivity evolve when acquired mutations risk a lethal loss of high-affinity binding? A detailed understanding of selectivity in such complexes requires structural information on weak, noncognate complexes which can be difficult to obtain due to their transient and dynamic nature. Using NMR-based docking as a guide, we deployed a disulfide-trapping strategy on a noncognate complex between the colicin E9 endonuclease (E9 DNase) and immunity protein 2 (Im2), which is seven orders of magnitude weaker binding than the cognate femtomolar E9 DNase-Im9 interaction. The 1.77 Å crystal structure of the E9 DNase-Im2 complex reveals an entirely noncovalent interface where the intersubunit disulfide merely supports the crystal lattice. In combination with computational alanine scanning of interfacial residues, the structure reveals that the driving force for binding is so strong that a severely unfavorable specificity contact is tolerated at the interface and as a result the complex becomes weakened through “frustration.” As well as rationalizing past mutational and thermodynamic data, comparing our noncognate structure with previous cognate complexes highlights the importance of loop regions in developing selectivity and accentuates the multiple roles of buried water molecules that stabilize, ameliorate, or aggravate interfacial contacts. The study provides direct support for dual-recognition in colicin DNase-Im protein complexes and shows that weakened noncognate complexes are primed for high-affinity binding, which can be achieved by economical mutation of a limited number of residues at the interface.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein–protein interfacesCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2009
- Convergence and combination of methods in protein–protein dockingCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2009
- Consequences of localized frustration for the folding mechanism of the IM7 proteinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Inference of Macromolecular Assemblies from Crystalline StateJournal of Molecular Biology, 2007
- Design of Multi-Specificity in Protein InterfacesPLoS Computational Biology, 2007
- Computational Design of a New Hydrogen Bond Network and at Least a 300-fold Specificity Switch at a Protein−Protein InterfaceJournal of Molecular Biology, 2006
- Probing a protein–protein interaction by in vitro evolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction networkNature, 2004
- Highly Discriminating Protein–Protein Interaction Specificities in the Context of a Conserved Binding Energy HotspotJournal of Molecular Biology, 2004
- Shape Complementarity at Protein/Protein InterfacesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1993