The assessment of genetic risk of breast cancer: a set of GP guidelines
Open Access
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 16 (1) , 71-77
- https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/16.1.71
Abstract
Background. Assessing a genetic risk for developing breast cancer is not an easy task for a GP. Current expert guidelines for referring and counselling women with a family history positive for breast cancer are complex and difficult to apply in general practice, and have only two strategies (to refer or not to refer for genetic counselling), giving no guidance for the GP on the management of women with a moderately increased risk of familial breast cancer. Objectives. We aimed to develop a set of simple practical guidelines for use in primary care for assessing risk and advising women with a positive family history in general practice and aimed to explore its performance. Methods. Based on a consensus meeting of the Leiden working party of hereditary tumours, the GPs of a university-related health care centre developed a set of GP guidelines to assess risk and advise women with a family history positive for breast cancer in general practice. The GP guidelines include four therapeutic strategies (reassuring, starting surveillance, starting surveillance and contacting a family cancer clinic, referring to a family cancer clinic). Its performance was tested in 67 patients whose pedigrees were available together with the risk assessment of a clinical geneticist using Claus’ tables as a gold standard. The gold standard was dichotomized regarding (i) referral to a family cancer clinic and (ii) surveillance. Two existing expert guidelines were similarly compared. Results. Regarding referral to a family cancer clinic, the GP guidelines were very specific, whereas the expert guidelines were more sensitive. Regarding surveillance, the GP guidelines were very sensitive, whereas the expert guidelines were very specific. The total number of misclassified patients was lowest when using the GP guidelines, and higher when using the expert guidelines. Conclusions. The GP guidelines provide a simplification of current guidelines. Before using them on a larger scale, more testing and refining are needed to increase their sensitivity regarding a referral to a family cancer clinic and their specificity regarding surveillance. They incorporate a role for the GP in the care for women with a family history positive for breast cancer with a moderately increased risk.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Contributions ofBRCA1andBRCA2to Early-Onset Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Women worried about their familial breast cancer risk--a study on genetic advice in general practiceFamily Practice, 1997
- Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2Nature, 1995
- Age at diagnosis as an indicator of eligibility for BRCA1 DNA testing in familial breast cancerHuman Genetics, 1995
- Assessment and Counseling for Women With a Family History of Breast CancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- A Collaborative Survey of 80 Mutations in the BRCA1 Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility GeneJAMA, 1995
- A Strong Candidate for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Gene BRCA1Science, 1994
- Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk predictionCancer, 1994
- Fortnightly Review: Familial breast cancerBMJ, 1994
- Inherited Breast and Ovarian CancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993