Influence of low-level resistance to vancomycin on efficacy of teicoplanin and vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecium
Open Access
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 35 (8) , 1570-1575
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.35.8.1570
Abstract
Emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains among enterococci raises a new clinical challenge. Rabbits with aortic endocarditis were infected with Enterococcus faecium BM4172, a clinical strain resistant to low levels of vancomycin (MIC, 16 micrograms/ml) and susceptible to teicoplanin (MIC, 1 micrograms/ml), and against its susceptible variant E. faecium BM4172S obtained in vitro by insertional mutagenesis (MICs, 2 and 0.5 micrograms/ml, respectively). Control animals retained 8 to 10.5 log10 CFU/g of vegetation. We evaluated in this model the efficacy of vancomycin (30 mg/kg of body weight; mean peak and trough serum levels, 27 and 5 micrograms/ml, respectively), teicoplanin (standard dose, 10 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 23 and 9 micrograms/ml, respectively; and high dose, 20 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 63 and 25 micrograms/ml, respectively), gentamicin (6 mg/kg; mean peak and trough levels, 8.6 and less than 0.1 micrograms/ml, respectively), alone or in combination, given every 12 h intramuscularly for 5 days. Teicoplanin standard dose was as active as vancomycin against both strains. Vancomycin was not effective against E. faecium BM4172 but was highly effective against E. faecium BM4172S (7.5 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus 4.9 +/- 1.0 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for vancomycin against E. faecium BM4172 and E. faecium BM4172S, respectively; P = 0.0012). A high dose of teicoplanin was more effective than vancomycin against E. faecium BM4172 (4.4 +/- 1.8 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus 7.5 +/- 1.1 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for teicoplanin high dose and vancomycin, respectively; P less than 0.05). Against E. faecium BM4172 glycopeptide-gentamicin combinations were the most effective regimens in vitro and in vivo (2.8 +/- 0.7 and 3.5 +/- 1.3 log10 CFU/g of vegetation for vancomycin plus gentamicin and teicoplanin standard dose plus gentamicin, respectively; P < 0.05 versus single-drug regimens). We concluded that high-dose teicoplanin or the combination of a glycopeptide antibiotic plus gentamicin was effective against experimental infection due to E. faecium with low-level resistance to vancomycin.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resistance of enterococci to glycopeptidesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1990
- Activity of sulbactam in combination with ceftriaxone in vitro and in experimental endocarditis caused by Escherichia coli producing SHV-2-like beta-lactamaseAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1990
- High-level vancomycin-resistant enterococci causing hospital infectionsEpidemiology and Infection, 1989
- Inducible Resistance to Vancomycin in Enterococcus faecium D366The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Evaluation of Antibiotic Diffusion into Cardiac Vegetations by Quantitative AutoradiographyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Plasmid-Mediated Resistance to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Enterococcus FaeciumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The phannacokinetics and extravascular diffusion of teicoplanin in rabbits and comparative efficacy with vancomycin in an experimental endocarditis modelJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1988
- VANCOMYCIN-RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCIThe Lancet, 1988
- Emergence of Vancomycin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative StaphylococciNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Early Termination of a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Teicoplanin and Flucloxacillin for Treating Severe Staphylococcal InfectionsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1987