Dominant Paradigms Overturned or ‘Business as Usual’? Development Discourse and the White Paper on International Development
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Critique of Anthropology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 15-29
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x0002000106
Abstract
Using the Department for International Development’s recent White Paper on Development as a case study, this article critically reassesses Escobar’s notion of development discourse. Rather than being monolithic and static, as Escobar and others have implied, the writers argue that changes can and do take place within development organizations. Not only does the White Paper clearly signal a new direction in policy; it also results both from changes within DFID – in personnel and in the balance of power between interest groups – and between DFID and civil society.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participatory Development and the Appropriation of Agency in Southern TanzaniaCritique of Anthropology, 2000
- Cultures of ConsultancyCritique of Anthropology, 2000
- Development, Impact Assessment and the Praise CultureCritique of Anthropology, 2000
- Routes of funding, roots of trust? Northern NGOs, Southern NGOs, donors, and the rise of direct fundingDevelopment in Practice, 1999
- The 1975 and 1997 White Papers compared: enriched vision, depleted policies?Journal of International Development, 1998
- Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational FrameworkDevelopment and Change, 1997
- An opportunity lost: Escobar's deconstruction of developmentThe Journal of Development Studies, 1997
- POSTSTRUCTURALIST APPROACHES TO DEVELOPMENT: SOME CRITICAL REFLECTIONSPeace & Change, 1996
- Inventing Social Categories Through Place: Social Representations and Development in NepalComparative Studies in Society and History, 1992
- Anthropology and the development encounter: the making and marketing of development anthropologyAmerican Ethnologist, 1991