Rate of viral rebound according to specific drugs in the regimen in 2120 patients with HIV suppression
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 18 (13) , 1795-1804
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200409030-00008
Abstract
Background: It is currently unclear whether the tendency for viral rebound in patients with viral load 400 copies/ml) was 4.9/100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0 - 5.8] for patients who were naive pre-HAART and 8.0/100 person-years (95% CI, 7.0 - 9.0) for those who were experienced with nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) pre-HAART. The rate of rebound was significantly higher in those taking nelfinavir than in those taking efavirenz, both in patients who were naive pre-HAART and those who were NRTI experienced [adjusted rate ratios, 2.83 (95% CI, 1.51 - 5.31) and 2.86 (95%, CI, 1.65 - 5.00), respectively]. Among patients who were naive pre-HAART, those on abacavir had no evidence of a raised risk of viral rebound (adjusted rate ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.51 - 2.69), but in those with pre-HAART NRTI experience the rate was markedly raised (adjusted rate ratio, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.51 - 8.00). A similar picture was seen when comparing those on nevirapine with those on efavirenz, although the elevated rate ratio in pre-HAART experienced patients was of lower magnitude (adjusted rate ratio, 1.93). There was no strong evidence that rebound rates differed significantly for any NRTI pairs compared with zidovudine/lamivudine. Conclusion: Viral rebound rates in patients who have attained <50 copies/ml appear to differ according to the specific drugs being used. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams WilkinKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Triple-Nucleoside Regimens versus Efavirenz-Containing Regimens for the Initial Treatment of HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Incidence of Resistance in a Double‐Blind Study Comparing Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Stavudine and Lamivudine to Nelfinavir plus Stavudine and LamivudineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Differences in Durability of Treatment with Initial PI-Based RegimensHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2003
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of simplified versus continued protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patientsAIDS, 2003
- Viral breakthrough after suppression with highly active antiretroviral therapyAIDS, 2003
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Rebound after Suppression to <400 Copies/mL during Initial Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens, according to Prior Nucleoside Experience and Duration of SuppressionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- A Randomized Trial of Simplified Maintenance Therapy with Abacavir, Lamivudine, and Zidovudine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Low Risk of Treatment Failure after Substitution of Nevirapine for Protease Inhibitors among Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients with Virus SuppressionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Virological, Immunological, and Clinical Impact of Switching from Protease Inhibitors to Nevirapine or to Efavirenz in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Long-Lasting Viral SuppressionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Immunological, virological and clinical response to highly active antiretroviral therapy treatment regimens in a complete clinic populationAIDS, 2000