Abstract
"The data of a previously reported study [20: 3493] in learning and retention are reanalyzed here to show the importance for reminiscence of parameters which had not been treated by earlier investigators in this field . . … The major findings pertinent to reminiscence are: 1. Reminiscence after a 'rest' interval as long as 24 hours occurs under conditions of ego-orientation, not task orientation. 2. Activity is a less important parameter for reminiscence than ego-orientation. Activity aids reminiscence only if the S is ego-oriented. 3. Differences in mental set may be experimentally induced or self-induced. The failure to control such differences in previous studies in this field could account for what Buxton [17: 2632] has termed 'the-now-you-see-it-now-you-don't character of reminiscence research.' 4. The conditions associated with rehearsal are also associated with reminiscence. Active Ss, and especially ego-oriented Ss, report rehearsal during the 'rest' interval. The mere tendency to rehearse, however, is not a sufficient condition to assure reminiscence. 5. Reminiscence data can be conceptualized within the frame work of studies in the field of completed and incompleted tasks . . …" 6. The theory thus developed "is consistent with, and supplemental to, the widely accepted theory of differential forgetting." 23 references. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: