Establishment size and risk of occupational injury
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Vol. 28 (1) , 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700280102
Abstract
For many years, the annual survey of occupational injuries and illnesses by the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has consistently reported, without explanation, that injury rates in the smaller establishments (higher fatality rates in small establishments in the mining, construction, manufacturing, and transportation industries and higher, or at least comparable, injury rates for small establishments in the mining industry. They are also inconsistent with increased turnover and decreased availability of occupational safety services in small companies. Moreover, injury severity, as measured by missed worktime, is greater for workers in small establishments. We investigated the possibility that interactions of workforce or injury characteristics with establishment size could explain the rate differences. We also reviewed the available literature to see whether differences in labor turnover rates could explain the BLS findings. Graphical and statistical analyses of the 1988 CPS Annual Demographic File, a sample of employed persons in the U.S. workforce, failed to identify any associations between workforce characteristics and enterprise size that would explain the lower rates. Similarly, graphical and statistical analyses of all Michigan workers incurring a compensable injury in 1986 failed to indicate any associations between injury characteristics and establishment size that would explain the lower rates. The potential role of labor turnover on the injury rate was analyzed from data in the literature on turnover rate by establishment size and risk of injury by time on the job. None of these analyses explains the lower injury rates reported for small establishments. This leaves underreporting of injuries from small establishments as a substantial possibility. If small establishments were subject to the same injury incidence rates as midsize establishments, then the 1986 survey for Michigan may have missed as many as 54,000 injuries (and far more nationally). We suggest that BLS undertake methodological studies to validate the completeness of reporting from small establishments.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transport injuries in small coal mines: An exploratory analysisAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1993
- Current methods of estimating severity for occupational injuries and illnesses: Data from the 1986 Michigan comprehensive compensable injury and illness databaseAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1993
- Work-related deaths in construction painting.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1992
- A case‐control study of risk factors for industrial low back injury: Implications for primary and secondary prevention programsAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1991
- Using Occupational Safety and Health Administration Accident Investigations to Study Patterns in Work FatalitiesJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1990
- Fatal injuries in the construction industry in washington stateAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1987
- Back Injuries in Industry: A Retrospective StudySpine, 1986
- Choosing Models for Cross-ClassificationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- On maximum likelihood estimation in sparse contingency tablesComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 1983