Flow cytometric DNA content analysis in primary lung cancer: Comparison of results from fresh and paraffin‐embedded specimens
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 43 (1) , 36-39
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930430110
Abstract
Tumor DNA content was determined by flow cytometry in 24 surgically resected specimens from patients with primary lung cancer to compare results from fresh and paraffin-embedded specimens. We found a good correlation in DNA indices between fresh and paraffin-embedded specimens (r = .978), although one tumor with DNA near-diploidy was mistaken as DNA diploid in paraffin-embedded specimens. In the measurements of paraffin-embedded specimens, eight of 24 tumors were DNA multiploid and showed DNA content heterogeneity. These results indicate that DNA content analysis of paraffin-embedded specimens is helpful because it makes it easy to analyze multiple specimens from different parts of the tumor.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of fresh and paraffin‐embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneityCytometry, 1988
- DNA flow cytometry in metastases and a recurrency of malignant melanomasVirchows Archiv B Cell Pathology Including Molecular Pathology, 1987
- Flow cytometry, cellular DNA content, and prognosis in human malignancy.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Tumor heterogeneity in osteosarcoma as identified by flow cytometryCancer, 1987
- Differential pattern of DNA-Aneuploidy in human malignanciesPathology - Research and Practice, 1985
- Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumours.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- Convention on nomenclature for DNA cytometryCytometry, 1984
- Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry.Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1983
- The World Health Organization Histological Typing of Lung Tumours: Second EditionAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1982