Stimulus attributes of reactivated memory: Alleviation of ontogenetic forgetting in rats is context specific
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Psychobiology
- Vol. 21 (2) , 135-143
- https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420210203
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that ontogenetic forgetting (infantile amensia) can be alleviated by a number of different types of reminder treatment. The present study extends the information about the alleviation of infantile amnesia by examining the “content” of the reactivated memory. Toward tis purpose, one attribute of memory (environmental context) was examined in rats tested either shortly after training (preamnesic) or after 1‐week retention interval. For the latter, a reactivation treatment was used to reverse infantile amnesia. At both intervals, a context shift resulted in impaired performance of a conditioned fear response. These findings demonstrate that environment context is an important component of the originally encoded memory as well as the reactivated amnestic memory. The implications of these results for both the reactivation of memory and general memory processes are discussed.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alleviation of infantile amnesia in rats by internal and external contextual cuesDevelopmental Psychobiology, 1986
- Stimulus generalization of conditioned taste aversion in ratsBehavioral and Neural Biology, 1984
- Effects of cuing in an “irrelevant” contextLearning & Behavior, 1983
- Alleviation of infantile amnesia in rats by means of a pharmacological contextual stateDevelopmental Psychobiology, 1983
- Mechanisms for the cueing phenomenon: The addition of the cueing context to the training memoryLearning and Motivation, 1981
- Age-dependent contextual effects on short-term active avoidance retention in ratsBehavioral and Neural Biology, 1980
- Reactivation of Infant MemoryScience, 1980
- Attributes of memory.Psychological Review, 1969
- Reinstatement.Psychological Review, 1966
- The interval between training and test trials as a determiner of the slope of generalization gradients.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958