An aesthetic hedonic contrast paradox
- 1 December 1968
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 20 (3) , 225-232
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049536808255762
Abstract
A paradox in the relative hedonic evaluation of pictures was reported, and 2 forms of the paradox, strong and weak, were distinguished. Sequences of gradually changing pictures were valued by 48 Ss on a scale from 1 to 100 relative to the first member of the sequence with a fixed value of 10. Pooled results showed the last picture in a sequence was always valued more highly than the first, even if the identity of the pictures involved was reversed, whereas individual analyses revealed a less consistent and more complex pattern of responses. The paradox may be resolved by an explanation in terms of individual Ss shifting their frames of reference with successive stimuli.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- VARIABLES AFFECTING AESTHETIC APPRECIATION, IN RELATION TO AGEBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967
- Curiosity and ExplorationScience, 1966
- Additivity of value in the representation of aesthetic choicesAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1964
- Sequential effects in judgment.Psychological Bulletin, 1964
- On the problem of hysteresis in psychophysics.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- PERCEPTUAL JUDGEMENT AS A FUNCTION OF CONTEXTBritish Journal of Psychology, 1962
- On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958
- The Stability of Aesthetic JudgmentsThe Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 1956
- Esthetic Fatigue in RankingThe American Journal of Psychology, 1956
- Social Influences on Perception of Complex DrawingsThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1945