Predicting developmental processes from evolutionary patterns: a molecular phylogeny of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) and its relatives
Open Access
- 29 July 1995
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 349 (1327) , 103-111
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0096
Abstract
Central to most evolutionary research is the desire to understand the proximate and ultimate factors leading to increased biological diversity. Developmental and evolutionary biology are intimately linked since one factor that limits evolutionary diversification is ontogenetic feasibility to diversify morphology. The connection between these two biological disciplines, although historically recognized, remained long unappreciated. Most work in developmental biology is exclusively concerned with elucidating developmental processes in a small number of model systems, which are then assumed to be representative of a much larger number of species. Typically in this work developmental mutants are induced through mutagens and subsequently mutated genes are identified that are responsible for the altered (loss of function) and wildtype developmental phenotypes. Recently, the zebrafish,Danio rerio, has become one of the most popular model systems in vertebrate developmental biology. We present a DNA-based phylogeny for the zebrafish and 20 of its close relatives. The molecular phylogeny is based on homologous regions of the large (16S) and small (12S) mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. We argue that these closely related species of zebrafish, if viewed in an explicitly phylogenetic context, can be treated asnatural mutantsthat lend themselves well to comparative developmental work. Such comparisons might include the study of the developmental mechanisms of somatogenesis in various species of danios that differ in segment numbers (through hybridization, transgenic or other experimental embryological techniques). Based on the extensive zebrafish phylogeny we explore the connection between ontogeny and phylogeny and argue that evolutionary biology cannot only test plausible historical scenarios, but might also be able to predict and help characterize which differences in developmental processes are responsible for differences between species and more general evolutionary trends.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- A PCR-based Survey of Homeobox Genes in Ctenodrilus serratus (Annelida: Polychaeta)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1994
- A Genetic Linkage Map for the ZebrafishScience, 1994
- Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrateCurrent Biology, 1994
- Regulation of expression of transgenes in developing fishTransgenic Research, 1993
- Hybridization and gynogenesis in two species of the genus BrachydanioAquaculture, 1992
- Homeobox Genes Go EvolutionaryScience, 1992
- The evolution of developmental strategy in marine invertebratesTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1991
- Homeobox sequences of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio)Aquaculture, 1990
- Insitu hybridization patterns of zebrafish homeobox genes homologous to Hox-2.1 and En-2 of mouseBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1988
- Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in DrosophilaNature, 1980