Interest Intermediation in Capitalist and Socialist Systems
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Political Science Review
- Vol. 4 (2) , 153-172
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218300400203
Abstract
Because most studies of interest intermediation have not been undertaken comparatively, it is desirable to apply to the study of East European socialist systems a functionalist comparative taxonomy, notably by applying the concept of subsystem autonomy. It is argued that limited subsystem autonomy may increase the problem-solving capabilities of political systems, while high subsystem autonomy may have dysfunctional consequences. Combining a functional with a genetic perspective, the emergence of neo-corporatist interest intermediation has been in part attributable to the specific cultural characteristics originating in the early industrialization of certain European countries. Capitalist and socialist systems are facing comparable functional problems.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The evolution of forms of working‐class protest in Poland: Sociological reflections on the Gdańsk‐szczecin case, August 1980Soviet Studies, 1981
- The National Accord as a Social ContractILR Review, 1980
- Liberal Corporatism and Party GovernmentComparative Political Studies, 1977
- Interest Groups and Communist PoliticsWorld Politics, 1966
- The Logic of Collective ActionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1965
- The Utility and Limitations of Interest Group Theory in Non-American Field SituationsThe Journal of Politics, 1960
- A Comparative Study of Interest Groups and the Political ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1958