Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
Open Access
- 17 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pediatrics
- Vol. 9 (1) , 38
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-9-38
Abstract
The Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) has achieved a lot with limited resources in producing high quality systematic reviews to assist clinicians in evidence-based decision-making. A formal assessment of published CNRG systematic reviews has not been undertaken; we sought to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of systematic reviews (both methodologic and reporting quality) published in CNRG.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cochrane reviews in neonatology: Past, present and futureSeminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2006
- Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical LiteratureAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic ReviewsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- The Cochrane Collaboration-Advances and Challenges in Improving Evidence-based Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1998
- The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health careJAMA, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Evidence-Based Medicine: Why All The Fuss?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Agreement among reviewers of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesPublished by Elsevier ,1991