Clinical Significance of Minimal Changes on Intravenous Urography after Spinal Cord Injury
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 58 (2-4) , 256-260
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1986.tb09050.x
Abstract
Evidence is given to support the thesis that minimal pyelocaliectasis and ureterectasis are of little clinical significance in spinal cord injured patients. Such renal changes almost always improve or remain stable on sequential examinations. Since moderate or severe pyelocaliectasis is usually detected by renal scintillation procedures, these findings support its use as a urinary tract screening examination along with an abdominal radiograph to detect calculi. The need for long-term serial examination of the urinary tract in spinal cord injury is emphasized.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effective Renal Plasma Flow: Clinical Significance after Spinal Cord InjuryJournal of Urology, 1985
- Renal Function after Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord InjuryJournal of Urology, 1984
- New formulas for the calculation of effective renal plasma flowEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1982
- Comprehensive Renal Scintillation Procedures in Spinal Cord Injury: Comparison with Excretory UrographyJournal of Urology, 1981
- Evaluation of Renal Function by Excretory UrographyJournal of Urology, 1980
- A macrofunction for computer processing of comprehensive renal function studiesEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1980
- Assessment of Renal Function from Plasma Creatinine in Adult PatientsScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1977
- The radiology of obstructive atrophy of the kidneyClinical Radiology, 1966