Optimal Behavior: Can Foragers Balance Two Conflicting Demands?
- 28 November 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 210 (4473) , 1041-1043
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4473.1041
Abstract
According to much current theory, organisms should be able to balance the conflicting demands of the need to feed efficiently and the need to avoid predators while feeding. In an experimental conflict situation, it was possible to evaluate the relative fitnesses associated with the available choices and to compare the observed behaviors with predictions derived from fitness considerations. A backswimmer, Notonecta hoffmanni , was capable of balancing these two conflicting factors adaptively.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal foraging, the marginal value theoremPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.)Nature, 1978
- Optimal foraging in patches: A case for stochasticityTheoretical Population Biology, 1977
- Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and TestsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1977
- Analyzing Shapes of Foraging Areas: Some Ecological and Economic TheoriesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1976
- Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism1Limnology and Oceanography, 1976
- Some Demographic Consequences of Food Shortage for the Predator, Notonecta hoffmanniEcology, 1975
- On the Optimal Aboveground Activity of Bannertail Kangaroo RatsJournal of Mammalogy, 1974
- On the Theory of Optimal DietsThe American Naturalist, 1974
- On Optimal Use of a Patchy EnvironmentThe American Naturalist, 1966