Further evaluation of reproducibility and prognostic value of histologic typing and grading in FIGO stage I ovarian cancer patients without systemic locoregional adjuvant treatment

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• Flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase heterogeneity in advanced ovarian carcinoma
  Cancer, 1994
• Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in ovarian tumors association of ploidy with tumor type, histologic grade, and clinical stage
  Cancer, 1992
• The prognostic variability of ovarian tumor grading by different pathologists
  Gynecologic Oncology, 1987
• Factors influencing survival in carcinoma of the ovary. Study from a well-defined swedish population
  Cancer, 1985
• Prognostic significance of histologic classification and grading of epithelial malignancies of the ovary
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
• Interobserver variability in the interpretation of epithelial ovarian cancer
  Gynecologic Oncology, 1984
• Prognostic factors in malignant epithelial ovarian tumors
  Gynecologic Oncology, 1983
• Disagreement of histopathological diagnoses of different pathologists in ovarian tumors — with some theoretical considerations
  European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1982
• Advanced ovarian cancer correlation of histologic grade with response to therapy and survival
  Cancer, 1980
• Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary.Histologic criteria and clinical behavior
  Cancer, 1973