Albumin Evolution in Frogs: A Test of the Evolutionary Clock Hypothesis
- 1 December 1971
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 68 (12) , 3127-3129
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.68.12.3127
Abstract
Frogs are an ancient group compared to placental mammals. Yet, although there are about as many species of frogs as there are of mammals, zoologists consider that frogs have undergone only limited morphological divergence, while placental mammals have diversified greatly in morphology and way of life. The serum albumins of numerous frog species were compared by the quantitative microcomplement fixation technique. Frogs that are morphologically similar enough to merit taxonomic distinction at only the species level often exhibit differences in the serological properties of their albumins larger than those usually seen between mammals placed in distinct families or suborders. Thus, there seems to be a contrast between albumin evolution and evolution at the organismal level. The large differences between albumins among frogs can be explained by the hypothesis that albumin evolution has proceeded at the same rate in frogs as in mammals.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amino-acid Sequences of Kangaroo Myoglobin and Haemoglobin and the Date of Marsupial-Eutherian DivergenceNature, 1971
- Auditory Illusions and ConfusionsScientific American, 1970
- The β‐chain of frog hemoglobin (Rana esculenta): The complete amino acid sequenceFEBS Letters, 1970
- An immunologic study of the relationships of non-human primates to manComparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 1969
- Pinniped Origins and the Rate of Evolution of Carnivore AlbuminsSystematic Zoology, 1969
- Rates of albumin evolution in primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1967
- Quantitative Immunochemistry and the Evolution of Primate Albumins: Micro-Complement FixationScience, 1966
- Antigenic Correspondence of Serum Albumins among the PrimatesScience, 1966