The United States and the Reconstruction of Germany in the 1920s
- 1 January 1976
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Business History Review
- Vol. 50 (4) , 477-502
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3113137
Abstract
The foreign economic policy of the United States in the aftermath of World War I was not isolationist, but selectively interventionist. With a group of very able American businessmen-diplomats in the lead, the nation pressured the French to accept the Dawes Plan, which, it was hoped, would solve the reparations problem, encourage healthy economic recovery and growth (which would embrace large sales of American capital goods to Germany), and ensure peaceful contentment in two nations that were more bitter enemies than ever. But, Professor Costigliola shows, a plan to rebuild Germany that was half private business and half foreign policy, and that was manipulated to both ends, could not succeed in the marketplace, where it had to live or die.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Other Side of Isolationism: The Establishment of the First World Bank, 1929-1930Journal of American History, 1972
- The Origins of Republican War Debt Policy, 1921-1923: A Case Study in the Applicability of the Open Door InterpretationJournal of American History, 1972
- Walther Rathenau and the Weimar Republic: The Politics of ReparationsThe American Historical Review, 1972
- Walther Rathenau and the Weimar RepublicPublished by Project MUSE ,1971
- Heir to EmpirePublished by JSTOR ,1969
- Streseman and Politics of Weimar RepublicPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1963
- A Journal of ReparationsThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1940
- War Debts and World ProsperityJournal of Farm Economics, 1933
- The Dawes ReportForeign Affairs, 1924